<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>lean &amp; six-sigma - Latest Comments in ISO 9001 review</title><link>http://leansixsigma.disqus.com/</link><description>lean &amp; six-sigma plus eveything in between</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:41:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ISO 9001 review</title><link>http://learnsigma.com/iso-9001-review/#comment-4567039</link><description>We are also an ISO 2001. I think it's very long procedure to certificate ISO.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hemorrhoids </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:41:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ISO 9001 review</title><link>http://learnsigma.com/iso-9001-review/#comment-1495652</link><description>As Michael Winner would say, "Calm down dear"! Best to lie down in a dark room until the anger subsides - that's a correction, not a preventive action by the way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ISO 9001 review</title><link>http://learnsigma.com/iso-9001-review/#comment-1495653</link><description>Clarification on the difference between corrective and preventative action? For crying out loud, how many attempts do you need to clarify something so bleeding simple?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;... and then they develop half a dozen criteria for the boardroom that allow auditors behave like they are John Harvey Jones. What exactly is the process approach top "Top Management" anyway? This is what you get when you allow management system standards to be developed by (ex) inspectors, auditors, welders and engineers</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">capablepeople</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:40:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>